Why CRMs Fail
The research is all over the place. At least half of CRM implementations fail to meet expectations. (ZDNet). Yet, more and more money is spent on CRM every year… more than $10B spent each year and growing by 10 to 20% annually. (CRM Landmark)
Why?
There are countless articles out there written to tell you how to get your CRM project right. There are thousands of CRM consultants
available to help you plan, implement and manage your CRM system. And still businesses keep getting it wrong.
The most commonly cited reason for failure is lack of end user adoption. In most small and medium sized businesses, that means the sales people just never start using the new CRM regularly. Within most SMBs that have recently implemented a new CRM solution, you’ll find that a few of the sales people are using the CRM heavily and just as many hardly use it at all. And so the results are very inconsistent, even within a single company.
For small and medium sized businesses, the objective of the new CRM system is normally related to basic information sharing amongst the customer facing team, sales pipeline management and marketing automation. That means virtually all the information to be managed and analyzed must come from the sales team.
And therein lies the problem. We’ve all heard “garbage in – garbage out”. Well with CRM struggles, it’s more like random input = random output.
It’s pretty simple really. If you want your customer service team to have access to the details about a new customer and maybe even a copy of the proposal the sales person sent, then the sales people have to be sure they enter that information for all their customers. If you want to be able to send an email offer to all prospects in a certain industry, then your sales team has to click the box in the CRM that indicates which industry every customer is in.
Unfortunately, management and CRM vendors doom many projects from the outset. Management has their reasons for investing in CRM technology. In a small or medium sized business, the most common objectives of management for the CRM solution are:
· Sales Activity Measurement (how many calls are getting made by each sales rep?)
· Sales Pipeline Management (how many deals are we currently chasing?)
· Team Selling Enablement (what’s going on with the XYZ Inc. deal?)
· Marketing Automation (get my company’s message in front of people more often)
So, the VP of Sales or the Business Owner and the IT guy and maybe the Marketing Admin all get together and start looking at CRM vendors. They evaluate solutions from the perspective of the cool dashboards and reports that the CRM vendors show them for managing sales pipeline, etc. After all, the manager’s not planning to input much data. Marketing looks at how the CRM system will integrate with the web site and how the CRM technology enables email blasts, etc.
If a sales person is involved in the CRM solution evaluation process, it’s usually an exercise in “getting buy-in” from sales early on. That’s a good thing but, it misses the point. Sales people aren’t normally very analytical or process oriented and so their interest in the various CRM technologies is limited to looking at the cool bells and whistles that the CRM vendor has that are meaningful to sales people.
And that, my friends, is the #1 reason why CRMs fail. The CRM vendor is happy to let all parties believe they’re going to get everything they want. Generally, all CRM solutions have much more capability that will be used in a given business. So management sees that the CRM system can do a lot of great things for them. All the things they really want and are ready to spend money on and many things that just look cool and might be useful. And the same is true for marketing, sales, customer service, etc.
If 90% of the input into the CRM system is going to come from the sales team, then what marketing and management will be able to do with the system will be directly limited by the amount of consistent input by the sales team.
Shame on CRM Vendors! They know this. But none of the largest vendors in the SMB CRM market offer a process to ensure that new users of their CRM solution align management and marketing expectations and sales input requirements. In fact, Microsoft CRM, Salesforce.com, Sugar CRM, ACT!, Goldmine and most of the brand names in CRM offer generic training for managers, marketing and sales people separately, allowing this disconnect between what sales will be inputting and what management expects to get out of the system to persist even after the purchase. If you want someone to help you get this right, they’ll put you in touch with a reseller or consultant in your area. If you’re lucky, you get someone that will keep you on the right path but, there’s not guarantee.
The fact is that many business owners and sales executives are very hesitant to require much at all of their sales people. The sales people naturally push back on using the system and argue for lowering the bar and without realizing it, management has just ensured failure. Because they’re going to give the sales people flexibility in using the CRM solution, its assured that they won’t get the management metrics in any level of detail or consistency.
What to do to ensure your CRM system succeeds!
Most searches for CRM solutions get started sort of haphazardly. Maybe a new sales recruit or marketing manager joins the team and
starts twisting your arm about it. Or maybe there’s a real challenge or opportunity in your organization that CRM is the perfect answer for. The first thing most small and medium sized businesses do is to start looking around at options. It’s natural but, fatal. Since you’ve never bought or implemented a CRM system before, you’re not sure what you need. So, to get your head around your requirements, you start looking at what capabilities are offered at the price point you have in mind. That’s a classic “tail wagging the dog” scenario.
The first thing you should do is write down the business objectives you have without regard to the CRM technology that may or may not be available to you. Try to prioritize your objectives financially. Which have the greatest potential to impact your bottom line.
Then decide what the bare minimum is for you. Which of the business objectives for your new CRM system can you live without and which ones are must haves.
Now, think about the information that will have to be input into the CRM technology in order for you to be able to extract the metrics, analytics and reports you expect. Ask yourself if the sales team will be able to input that information in a timely and efficient way.
Essentially, you’re after a map of reports and metrics you want out of the system to input into the CRM technology.
With this, you can begin to investigate CRM vendors and technologies with two sets of requirements –
1) Which CRM solution does the best job of giving me the reporting, analytics and marketing capabilities we see as adding value to our business? And…
2) Which CRM solution will allow my sales team to input the corresponding information the most efficiently?
In the end, you’ll probably find that your requirements are driven less by cost and management needs than they are by what it’s reasonable to expect your sales team to enter into your new CRM all day every day.
Rest assured that you are going to have to tell your sales team exactly what they MUST do with this new CRM system. You must define the minimum level of data entry in the CRM in detail.
At this point you may be asking yourself why CRM vendors haven’t figured out how to make this process easy for you. Well, a few have. But, the truth is that need for growth drives most software, and certainly CRM, vendors to create sales compensation plans and reseller networks that are entirely volume oriented. The CRM vendor’s concern is not how much value you get out of the solution but only that you buy their CRM technology.
As I said, a few CRM vendors have built processes that lead new customer toward an integrated solution that balances business objectives, management expectations and sales input time. It’s rare though.
At SalesNexus, our small business orientation has led us create an implementation process that helps every new customer align expectations up front and adjust training plans and user requirements accordingly. In fact, our simple process for tailoring each new CRM solution to the individual customer’s needs has led to one of the CRM industry’s best customer retention rates. We’re very proud of that.
If you’d like to learn how we ensure our customers’ success with implementing CRM solutions that meet their unique needs, call us and ask your SalesNexus representative to explain what CRM implementation services are included in your subscription at no additional charge. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised.







[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TopSalesExperts, Instant QuoteStore. Instant QuoteStore said: Why CRMs Fail and What To Do About It http://bit.ly/5CLUgf [...]
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by QuoteStore: Why CRMs Fail and What To Do About It http://bit.ly/5CLUgf...
Great article Craig,
I have a question for you. When you quote that in some cases, 90% of input might be coming from sales (to benefit somewhat the organization in planning resources etc)why wouldn’t the CRM vendors recognize that and sell the components that provide view to the sales process only? The CRM vendor attitude of since all I have is a hammer, that HAS to be a nail has to stop. Sell what the client needs. Overselling functionality to clients that have unclear needs highly contributes to an unfocused, under utilized solution. Eventually, the sales team end up using an app with a large footprint to store birthdays and phone numbers.
Good question Michel!
Sure, you can simplify the amount of data input in the CRM by the sales person. That’s always a good thing.
Of course, you’ve got to have basic contact information input, which may be manually input from a business card. Then you need to know status – suspect, lead, prospect, proposal in process, client, etc.
Other than that, there may be a few details that are specific to your industry but, there should be as little as possible to input.
That doesn’t change the fact that in most businesses, its going to come from the sales person so, they’ve got to be consistent about it.
[...] “By its nature, CRM touches many roles within a company. Each group has varying expectations. At SalesNexus, we’ve developed a simple and effective method to ensure all CRM users get what they’re after.”, said Klein. “Why CRMs Fail and What To Do About It” is available here – http://sellsellsell.salesnexus.com/2010/01/15/why-crms-fail-and-what-to-do-about-it/ [...]
[...] 8, 2010 · Leave a Comment CRM implementations collectively cost organizations up to $10 billion annually, an amount that rises 10%-20% each year. Yet half of these ventures fail to meet management [...]
Well stated Craig. Perhaps the most profound (and painful) sentence in the article is: “But none of the largest vendors in the SMB CRM market offer a process to ensure that new users of their CRM solution align management and marketing expectations and sales input requirements.” The fact is that alignment of sales and marketing is critical and all the promises in the world won’t save the day if the CRM system doesn’t support synergy between the two groups.
[...] This post was Twitted by webbased_sales [...]
Good article. Nice to see a write-up about CRM that isn’t a bunch of fluff and buzzwords.
In my experience, to be successful with CRM in a sales organization, you have to look at it from the needs of both inside and outside sales.
For inside sales, who typically have small interactions with many potential customers, the CRM system needs to be pre-populated with quality leads and the process to update prospect information and sales opportunity needs to match their workflow.
For outside sales, who typically deal with long sales processes and a small base of potential customers, the CRM system typically provides no benefit to the sales person and is considerably more cumbersome than a mobile integrated calendering/to-do-list/email application such as Outlook. Thus, strict management policies must be enforced such as tying lead ownership or sales commission to CRM entries.
Moreover, we should be cognizant that it really isn’t in the best interest of sales personnel for management to have all of these monitoring tools–another factor working against CRM in a sales organization.
Lastly, I don’t really agree that 90% of the input into a CRM system comes from the sales team. Customer Care is typically the #1 user of the system.
I agree with you that CRM solution should align management and marketing expectations with sales input. And yes, most of the brands offer separate training for managers, marketing and sales because their features are specific to each of these key people in the business –a CRM for sales and marketing, a CRM for managers to track staff output, etc. So I guess the best CRM solution is the one which put together the features that are relevant to all key people in the business, hence everyone will have a better understanding of the tool and how it makes everyone’s life a lot easier.